0.52092133 BTC
0b059585c094266342a58c1ff2a6d0da01ba85bb6c34053ad9b873ca31625810
Confirmed in block 924,540, found by SpiderPool on 21 Nov 2025.
, in block 924,540
Confirmations
6 or more: final for most purposes
47,112 blocks sit on top of it. Undoing it would mean redoing all of them faster than the rest of the network. What a confirmation is
Facts
- Status
- Confirmed
- Moved
- 0.52092133 BTC$42,724 at today's price
- Fee
- 0.0000602 BTC6,020 sats, ≈ $4.94 today
- Fee rate
- 9.5 sat/vB
- Size
- 633 vB2,532 weight units
- Inputs and outputs
- 4 in, 11 out
Where it sits
From and to
The coins it spent, and where they went. One output often goes back to the sender, but nothing on the chain says which one. The 0.0000602 BTC missing between the two sides is the fee.
4 inputs
- bc1qc24nrrf8jucjtny77tezwjszmxy069wkvwpwc5from fd972a0a…7142c6b1:00.00420357 BTC
- bc1qm7hwmz2uwf7ccsg5de3ljmxn5zgxe2yqhqkah8from ecbb51ca…efdaac2f:20.00472572 BTC
- bc1q9yn6zdkjjlh0z5y6sqpdvwq7pwkeh5r0ka28adfrom 9c74ccc9…721d174a:00.09290793 BTC
- bc1q9yn6zdkjjlh0z5y6sqpdvwq7pwkeh5r0ka28adfrom 0deffc76…fd070f82:00.41914431 BTC
11 outputs
- bc1q9yn6zdkjjlh0z5y6sqpdvwq7pwkeh5r0ka28ad0.36371891 BTC
- bc1qayu9z36qlgzghfta0p28h5ms4qyrncj64j2k5r0.00140572 BTC
- 1FDKxa7bshRPtxE3D2DwWKAa3U6uhJia5e0.00152574 BTC
- 1KTySRT8yZDfSMvNJvLws3YdnR6s8rBcB70.00161607 BTC
- bc1q7epzqjrqgspt3jhdr6075frser8q3kplqgq5c60.00211745 BTC
- 1Hr3KWciid41StC4f35CZHjPok2PDLUWtJ0.00269788 BTC
- bc1qy6lgv5cgxlpc5vlwlvx63lql72eysa2ela5cgp0.00288434 BTC
- bc1qkcucasvc8z37se7njaajmdzv5sqq0asrm4jgcr0.00532428 BTC
- 3DgiYhcCDWxTLRmJmjndFUCw1sVeZybUux0.01396586 BTC
- bc1qegavdndd9wkw2l8nr6rcxjtqjtnuq5e9uhvcss0.0493 BTC
- bc1qy5pazaec56z5n646h7sv9ddcdalhvcfckvrpe90.07636508 BTC
Technical details
- Transaction ID
- 0b059585c094266342a58c1ff2a6d0da01ba85bb6c34053ad9b873ca31625810
- Witness ID (wtxid)
- 73f305f82d2ac28357d29adf989e8dcf7194d11b9d8063703703970f0f464a0b
- Version
- 1
- Locktime
- 0
- Size
- 957 B
- Virtual size
- 633 vB
- Weight
- 2,532 WU
- Position in block
- 94
Something look wrong? Tell us