50.01008876 BTC
d6381fbc752419cc1d63db049347c4d61a0ca011743cf18fae8ebeed2db4130f
Confirmed in block 206,725, found by Braiins Pool on 6 Nov 2012.
, in block 206,725
Confirmations
6 or more: final for most purposes
764,915 blocks sit on top of it. Undoing it would mean redoing all of them faster than the rest of the network. What a confirmation is
Facts
- Status
- Confirmed
- Moved
- 50.01008876 BTC$4,106,979 at today's price
- Fee
- 0.0015 BTC150,000 sats, ≈ $123 today
- Fee rate
- 62 sat/vB
- Size
- 2,418 vB9,672 weight units
- Inputs and outputs
- 13 in, 2 out
Where it sits
From and to
The coins it spent, and where they went. One output often goes back to the sender, but nothing on the chain says which one. The 0.0015 BTC missing between the two sides is the fee.
13 inputs
- 13kVYHMCnunPQCafZB6pTebTdNhCT419Nrfrom 27b33c94…4f633b01:00.43761289 BTC
- 1Pgn7ghVRzixGY3KaL9yg2C7V3ZGPKqpn8from 87ec4b96…cda10692:015 BTC
- 1DqWUUwSUknh2czt6v2imUQwj2LbWmpFLDfrom 6cfb4001…0a6bcaae:10.48459 BTC
- 1AzaeyrYt2GEmCCbsYsxsEqKGWcMVHa5rDfrom 9227ad67…675c95c9:10.66078088 BTC
- 1139WLTQ9izukmNpna86K6FLjcSuqY52MRfrom 735d4762…edab5707:16 BTC
- 1GmU57ceiGYg9SS5wtq5YhJf7qM1viTigBfrom 921b5dfa…262c47d6:00.00032 BTC
- 1139WLTQ9izukmNpna86K6FLjcSuqY52MRfrom 559389d6…51fb7274:17.6 BTC
- 1139WLTQ9izukmNpna86K6FLjcSuqY52MRfrom 8918cff4…513a76d7:111 BTC
- 1J7dxZW3Kko3H8VD97WCESdocv41UE8pKMfrom 072e91e2…cb974f90:10.12874392 BTC
- 1EEZQtDBQQqFxTKeniK4RzaMkugMQF9c7Xfrom 0cd00cb4…a12ab0e5:410.18045381 BTC
- 1CYvv78ZMKZQJrNy56A2Y4otNPse4yLtAHfrom 7d43a97d…dd0ab798:11.06108726 BTC
- 1FLYgBMRtjDV99iX8RTwhV1HN3qKtYbmi1from d635cc66…b1257f75:17.258 BTC
- 113zZAAbZiAbeP85zXdsWDBJgApZ5H7YHJfrom 036d7614…142513f1:10.2 BTC
2 outputs
- 18XoM7znv1s1j6GfaJTgNvt8bENroyDCuL0.01008876 BTC
- 1NShakJyWU5cBtrdGbRYyJzzE1KJTM1jPo50 BTC
Technical details
- Transaction ID
- d6381fbc752419cc1d63db049347c4d61a0ca011743cf18fae8ebeed2db4130f
- Version
- 1
- Locktime
- 0
- Size
- 2 kB
- Virtual size
- 2,418 vB
- Weight
- 9,672 WU
- Position in block
- 104
Something look wrong? Tell us