Block 135,484
Found by Eligius 2 minutes after the block before it. Its 61 transactions paid 0.03398947 BTC in fees, 0% of the miner's reward.
, 15 years 3 months ago
What's inside
Each square is one of its 61 transactions, as big as the space it took. The miner packs the best payers first, from the top left.
Facts
- Found
- 9 Jul 2011, 15:20 UTC
- Confirmations
- 838,486
- Size
- 19 kB1.9% full by weight
- Fees
- 0.03398947 BTC
- Reward
- 50.03398947 BTCnew coins plus fees
- Median fee rate
- 193 sat/vBmost paid 51 to 194 sat/vB
- Pool
- Eligiusfrom the coinbase: a claim, not proof
- Difficulty
- 1.56 M
Luck. Its hash made it under the target with an everyday margin: luckier than 30% of blocks.
The chain
It carries the hash of block 135,483, the block before it. Change anything in that block and its hash changes, so this one no longer fits: that is what makes the blocks a chain. Block 135,485 carries this one's hash in turn.
Transactions
In block order, the miner's reward first. 25 to a page.
Technical details
- Hash
- 000000000000078d87a4714f3ee3f2633a0034c7859152bf310230b8c6b3d444
- Previous hash
- 00000000000001db79602bff0d9179020e701d882c103334d9f9ea68ce326ae0
- Merkle root
- 27d7cb3e0141a776ad173cae2f110ed1d3e4faf409ce440eca93ce8263ef1965
- Version
- 0x00000001
- Bits
- 1a0abbcf
- Nonce
- 725,479,939
- Timestamp
- 1310224847
- Median time
- 9 Jul 2011, 14:34 UTC
- Weight
- 75,696 WU
- Chainwork
- 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000022dd6772b33170cfb
What the miner wrote in the block's first transaction: (nothing readable)
Paid to 14NFRNt2RdwssexgFAaMxWGyfS4KzjM3Ev, 1KpbBQSvyVdPXvxfRMUW3WvkYM1fXN62gz, 15EguD5iqyaeNxgt2TFk3hx4Tr4pDsS2uD, 1EENowVkwgp1PUujD7uRqzLrG6phCjLmh7, 1AjsBbH9BEJW89vkpYhJYCwq5YDWWSLVw6, 13uSqpiva9v8pQcJikkQ1vmszcns8SNjCK, 1JVx1uxegC2uaL2qbnfaKBAbEjgraG2aUE, 16DDvGqFL9zBMucuKdSdu9WwE8UVQnXKtF, 1HeX4zQNMECb1pX1XQSmFcuZGiYJGJ3AB4, 1JwnK2xerGmiYeuAvyc53QjP8aySWXJzvr, 1NXk9vEKg8LkcHtHwuZTPhFbUDS6L5Gy29, 1DCCgEWJjv22Duah9wh8F7HpwedPPaVDpv, 1jbDYpbYYhX4Q74Q3B4uJS35cn3GkQzoB
Something look wrong? Tell us