Block 228,644
Found by Eligius 4 minutes after the block before it. Its 157 transactions paid 0.05560001 BTC in fees, 0% of the miner's reward.
, 13 years 7 months ago
What's inside
Each square is one of its 157 transactions, as big as the space it took. The miner packs the best payers first, from the top left.
Facts
- Found
- 29 Mar 2013, 21:02 UTC
- Confirmations
- 746,255
- Transactions
- 157
- Size
- 96 kB9.6% full by weight
- Fees
- 0.05560001 BTC
- Reward
- 25.05560001 BTCnew coins plus fees
- Median fee rate
- 0.0 sat/vBmost paid 0.0 to 193 sat/vB
- Pool
- Eligiusfrom the coinbase: a claim, not proof
- Difficulty
- 6.70 M
Luck. Its hash was 4.2 times lower than it needed to be: luckier than 76% of blocks.
The chain
It carries the hash of block 228,643, the block before it. Change anything in that block and its hash changes, so this one no longer fits: that is what makes the blocks a chain. Block 228,645 carries this one's hash in turn.
Transactions
In block order, the miner's reward first. 25 to a page.
Technical details
- Hash
- 000000000000009797906347e9cacd75d51f02c00306392be3393803bb0cca1a
- Previous hash
- 00000000000000c6d39f0b7e7be10d1bccbb2051160ae08810ca3474fac7a334
- Merkle root
- 467e83aaf6a2a1ed196f83f888c5bd5e26d65350a9e27d617c9e6edf1e5e6b50
- Version
- 0x00000002
- Bits
- 1a02816e
- Nonce
- 2,215,455,503
- Timestamp
- 1364590973
- Median time
- 29 Mar 2013, 20:04 UTC
- Weight
- 383,392 WU
- Chainwork
- 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000003238c92e3e69fe7de8
What the miner wrote in the block's first transaction: Eligius /P2SH/
Paid to 1NQDLLBzxasNaxt6jGqa3NcfDQT3ywTdmJ, 1HvwVLStXfK1pftsCSoRMDbt49Cmzs3YXt, 1J5hcDUopEMiyav8cZMQy7DiaZsqyTy7cH, 1PSvhDBSqGshjpgyrRJP2e4fbseeQj7sDW, 1FSYere2w6XBm2oKJhTWQe7sLkvjpMnHrS, 1NmR5g8923xtgwtMnSrnXcmAvGxz5sJfkS, 1F8eY5CQMcTKEiFUSb4vFdwYGMnTbE3M91, 1ARLuy2zxQqLu7LTpFHviNqmudevEa325L, 1LvvhDyF1SmXoocrhDswJta3LkhRwmbTnn, 1HZ73SoN4s7rhRvAdYgBNZfvG4avcZ2cUD, 1Es1JbYNnFV2SSvox1aC167xDsCHGjaj5s, 17kSkaNptXsRmJPABthcPttxbMLypD2z6f, 18d3HV2bm94UyY4a9DrPfoZ17sXuiDQq2B
Something look wrong? Tell us