Block 299,897
Found by Eligius 15 minutes after the block before it. Its 638 transactions paid 0.11219641 BTC in fees, 0% of the miner's reward.
, 12 years 5 months ago
What's inside
Each square is one of its 638 transactions, as big as the space it took. The miner packs the best payers first, from the top left.
Facts
- Found
- 9 May 2014, 16:46 UTC
- Confirmations
- 673,661
- Transactions
- 638
- Size
- 393 kB39.3% full by weight
- Fees
- 0.11219641 BTC
- Reward
- 25.11219641 BTCnew coins plus fees
- Median fee rate
- 20 sat/vBmost paid 11 to 45 sat/vB
- Pool
- Eligiusfrom the coinbase: a claim, not proof
- Difficulty
- 8.00 G
Luck. Its hash was 2.1 times lower than it needed to be: luckier than 52% of blocks.
The chain
It carries the hash of block 299,896, the block before it. Change anything in that block and its hash changes, so this one no longer fits: that is what makes the blocks a chain. Block 299,898 carries this one's hash in turn.
Transactions
In block order, the miner's reward first. 25 to a page.
Technical details
- Hash
- 0000000000000000420cf324fb3037118c4ebf5318edb0289d76401bd417b0b6
- Previous hash
- 000000000000000012b1c9202eb5e4c4f689b3f1ce88ceed32c9c954a0fc8d11
- Merkle root
- e5250b7d180092e5ba20682a6765d514df8782c27b77b80ef2b8a85e1a6ea878
- Version
- 0x00000002
- Bits
- 1900896c
- Nonce
- 2,985,325,705
- Timestamp
- 1399654007
- Median time
- 9 May 2014, 16:18 UTC
- Weight
- 1,572,012 WU
- Chainwork
- 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000059bb5bee27c208ef6cca
What the miner wrote in the block's first transaction: Eligius /ss33/
Paid to 1QJRpp7WK2qLxjhRZuGoru9mzXuhuZKpKg, 1CgRtTNdTt9R3NyYSz8Mdo2j2C1RrDJ3Zb, 1GsMSR86ZV9vTuTtt2zxy5ZKQsWsKRZ7kR, 1Jrt2YXfTtiusEFRrfFoKFETPEq7RfLFRE, 12kES99z7qnzJDPedeGP1LB8SfhRUMpHbF, 1HuxHzDjTm8p1CLo1F1gWz8JmxYog5K9RP, 1CWhVvNveDQ49ZBPh2W18ChJUc1B9EWmsH, 1EC73VqvwVdyszgd6NcjPqHbWGpaAK8NPP, 15pfwX6hvUuqqUiZuVnx5o6KTCRfFKpufs, 19GdPHgdB3sSKkWERYBUL2i2rt2myHMNuh, 13gJrXUMnAYPZEMydP9pcjCy8yTxYfKQeq, 18aBb4GfX3QCN64xaJ3W3EuNzHL92v2UU1, 18d3HV2bm94UyY4a9DrPfoZ17sXuiDQq2B
Something look wrong? Tell us