Block 303,449
Found by Eligius 3 minutes after the block before it. Its 87 transactions paid 0.01481178 BTC in fees, 0% of the miner's reward.
, 12 years 4 months ago
What's inside
Each square is one of its 87 transactions, as big as the space it took. The miner packs the best payers first, from the top left.
Facts
- Found
- 31 May 2014, 09:55 UTC
- Confirmations
- 669,509
- Size
- 34 kB3.4% full by weight
- Fees
- 0.01481178 BTC
- Reward
- 25.01481178 BTCnew coins plus fees
- Median fee rate
- 26 sat/vBmost paid 11 to 68 sat/vB
- Pool
- Eligiusfrom the coinbase: a claim, not proof
- Difficulty
- 10.46 G
Luck. Its hash made it under the target with an everyday margin: luckier than 42% of blocks.
The chain
It carries the hash of block 303,448, the block before it. Change anything in that block and its hash changes, so this one no longer fits: that is what makes the blocks a chain. Block 303,450 carries this one's hash in turn.
Transactions
In block order, the miner's reward first. 25 to a page.
Technical details
- Hash
- 00000000000000003d127ba0e7bf8185faba8790520ceb818f4b7fb257441853
- Previous hash
- 00000000000000002451040b804099b6e5debc646eff315371480371cb99cbff
- Merkle root
- c67c1e4866eb344878095929bae912221f7776d871e86bf341d0e988a83258e1
- Version
- 0x00000002
- Bits
- 18692842
- Nonce
- 678,970,805
- Timestamp
- 1401530156
- Median time
- 31 May 2014, 08:19 UTC
- Weight
- 136,776 WU
- Chainwork
- 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000777ca082d4d9f64f5100
What the miner wrote in the block's first transaction: Eligius /ss36/
Paid to 1FCjdibNnQmyruEfWt4fWVuoMevVVJ7pwC, 12uwDhJREPcSHmTdEfSveoJrTkrXBDuvq5, 1C2dgPEAUbotoHSLyrdVSWW11hdorrQ7jW, 1KqB2TDDWKr9QUQW8mKkwXN446gQmJjmFY, 1NZpPC2LVWfAobPQAngD76pwHDnwTAU1mn, 17fqhPafq2X2UHGbTi6aGDzJXVz8VA6yij, 1x4JVFHaSBCMzhFLFAF8AwoSJEb8md4mA, 1NKiceMNYowLWQDfJkKpj6iaiPHhg4iwhq, 15BFWimRXSSjbTyDNHBYeuyyGhxZz5h1yn, 1K7qrEdNwcpZsMA1iJBfgnvHzZ6dbZF2Xp, 1LeggTotgZCusrZrsyAU4wSd3oyffsVTGC, 18aBb4GfX3QCN64xaJ3W3EuNzHL92v2UU1, 18d3HV2bm94UyY4a9DrPfoZ17sXuiDQq2B
Something look wrong? Tell us