Block 315,264
Found by KnCMiner 6 minutes after the block before it. Its 97 transactions paid 0.0135515 BTC in fees, 0% of the miner's reward.
, 12 years 3 months ago
What's inside
Each square is one of its 97 transactions, as big as the space it took. The miner packs the best payers first, from the top left.
Facts
- Found
- 12 Aug 2014, 13:42 UTC
- Confirmations
- 660,097
- Size
- 88 kB8.8% full by weight
- Fees
- 0.0135515 BTC
- Reward
- 25.0135515 BTCnew coins plus fees
- Median fee rate
- 0.0 sat/vBmost paid 0.0 to 44 sat/vB
- Pool
- KnCMinerfrom the coinbase: a claim, not proof
- Difficulty
- 19.73 G
Luck. Its hash made it under the target with an everyday margin: luckier than 40% of blocks.
The chain
It carries the hash of block 315,263, the block before it. Change anything in that block and its hash changes, so this one no longer fits: that is what makes the blocks a chain. Block 315,265 carries this one's hash in turn.
Transactions
In block order, the miner's reward first. 25 to a page.
Technical details
- Hash
- 0000000000000000212e8bdbb0c11d0eff537b411431cdc356b778aef085f790
- Previous hash
- 00000000000000001340ba27311834275c3b74792c33eb0768a1ed3ba7a7a82e
- Merkle root
- 238ac080c5b3df529c2ddc39059031913a52b7acafb9497d32ab6aed5251c77d
- Version
- 0x00000002
- Bits
- 1837ba62
- Nonce
- 4,051,666,151
- Timestamp
- 1407850973
- Median time
- 12 Aug 2014, 13:16 UTC
- Weight
- 352,680 WU
- Chainwork
- 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000011db165f90867cdef9d9b
What the miner wrote in the block's first transaction: KnCMinerB-P1
Paid to 1ETs4pPL2zUS6xz9Bij4WrQ81RHi4yxNzA, 1yvj6Mat9Yj3CmUuCxW6mAQP9ww45K5U5, 1DcAvyJnee3wEPZ6kNxsfJkkfJh2quKxMd, 1NcEcX43mUYVwFgH9bkKU5FB45VM2Akv63, 1HswgjgGZN7YS7aQxLaXicGBLo4vsyUQsx, 1NQ4uvSUVx7aGddhu8JkhbLMVwuHZSnHah, 1Gi4LzA6Y1DtXddjSTHekQusocMiRhtjiG, 154vjnVyV4aXpiEJJQWPSvQbz66AYhjLp1, 1Ew9m44zjushE7AqYvKDzAAcTABDki6owU, 1NYZg7UMJQ8g1uqiVonURy5YqCQix6hCEQ, 16GSYmW7JYQoXY4o8QYiwF2K7nsWfsdiGP, 17y9Gz8MQCKsLAzR1dCC187MFjbwK7nzhj, 1H1sq6Msgt9HjRrBuz8ieZdThzWXS6oPVA
Something look wrong? Tell us