Block 326,934
Found by KnCMiner 1 minute after the block before it. Its 86 transactions paid 0.01201706 BTC in fees, 0% of the miner's reward.
, 11 years 11 months ago
What's inside
Each square is one of its 86 transactions, as big as the space it took. The miner packs the best payers first, from the top left.
Facts
- Found
- 25 Oct 2014, 13:41 UTC
- Confirmations
- 645,185
- Size
- 86 kB8.6% full by weight
- Fees
- 0.01201706 BTC
- Reward
- 25.01201706 BTCnew coins plus fees
- Median fee rate
- 11 sat/vBmost paid 0.0 to 39 sat/vB
- Pool
- KnCMinerfrom the coinbase: a claim, not proof
- Difficulty
- 35.99 G
Luck. Its hash made it under the target with an everyday margin: luckier than 29% of blocks.
The chain
It carries the hash of block 326,933, the block before it. Change anything in that block and its hash changes, so this one no longer fits: that is what makes the blocks a chain. Block 326,935 carries this one's hash in turn.
Transactions
In block order, the miner's reward first. 25 to a page.
Technical details
- Hash
- 000000000000000015af7f4feda55a751124681eeca9e621263e6e0fdf08ddde
- Previous hash
- 00000000000000001d08e03c54ea809d98a07137156458d322f40974104c524c
- Merkle root
- 30c633c9c428566803b0866b540e04439909af9bb191d7c5ae5409183789cf5f
- Version
- 0x00000002
- Bits
- 181e8dc0
- Nonce
- 3,503,659,844
- Timestamp
- 1414244466
- Median time
- 25 Oct 2014, 12:41 UTC
- Weight
- 345,672 WU
- Chainwork
- 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000253bcbc6fe66e690a7a29
What the miner wrote in the block's first transaction: KnCMinerB-P1
Paid to 157eMTgavDPz1RKjxdT23QYb8oq49isVBR, 125YehS25f8PMeqYzGEDHBd9cAP1CEPCNR, 1Ak8MdkTUsLwJCKAruZsMWhNzq8QZbunU4, 177U8keqkfrMqAiD5uJz4ZcwdHsS4qFjTZ, 1L6cDfZMgvK4hgCfxTKErPQDk2rso6Np91, 1Q1TEBLwjia4exBb4EnLjtRZFt47ZL3RrM, 17WG9NZfMQWabwsdvWnnjdHpN1czjpRm6K, 12sZgs8u5gAjyrG7cULiRbDzvbbefNsWY8, 1LDUqttG9C7YgHVSW4cf6Mow3qauL3WYf7, 1PxMbwb7JtGAHiPYAft6Y3CujpMUi8pLNM, 193LhB4JXZufqdf2dmYDdeQioBVAZGUwhL, 1AnccTSaGHwTQgzr6K4NFJ19LsvFjvM4nJ, 1H1sq6Msgt9HjRrBuz8ieZdThzWXS6oPVA
Something look wrong? Tell us