Block 363,258
Found by Eligius 6 minutes after the block before it. Its 188 transactions paid 0.03587012 BTC in fees, 0% of the miner's reward.
, 11 years 4 months ago
What's inside
Each square is one of its 188 transactions, as big as the space it took. The miner packs the best payers first, from the top left.
Facts
- Found
- 30 Jun 2015, 23:12 UTC
- Confirmations
- 610,275
- Transactions
- 188
- Size
- 52 kB5.2% full by weight
- Fees
- 0.03587012 BTC
- Reward
- 25.03587012 BTCnew coins plus fees
- Median fee rate
- 44 sat/vBmost paid 38 to 104 sat/vB
- Pool
- Eligiusfrom the coinbase: a claim, not proof
- Difficulty
- 49.40 G
Luck. Its hash was 3.1 times lower than it needed to be: luckier than 68% of blocks.
The chain
It carries the hash of block 363,257, the block before it. Change anything in that block and its hash changes, so this one no longer fits: that is what makes the blocks a chain. Block 363,259 carries this one's hash in turn.
Transactions
In block order, the miner's reward first. 25 to a page.
Technical details
- Hash
- 0000000000000000071359c423077912ed499e7351de61b9462d4178f2b45e94
- Previous hash
- 000000000000000011cee810626c8341c515cdcc8edbf94390a43fc912621101
- Merkle root
- b330d82575534f8148860553688ca2fb6c3633e18c7cbf410e3b9f0de11ae694
- Version
- 0x00000003
- Bits
- 1816418e
- Nonce
- 2,585,547,107
- Timestamp
- 1435705973
- Median time
- 30 Jun 2015, 22:18 UTC
- Weight
- 209,748 WU
- Chainwork
- 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000080f78cea08018ae80ebdc
What the miner wrote in the block's first transaction: Eligius /ss30/
Paid to 1NvDKDEwcNBRc34dUSWMXJLjwPDg99yRFX, 12x3cSmAVWgx7Y3ENsn2JhpT9xa283Bz54, 19MRmWDDbFcExW4yvr1tDiH3DjQ4UBWh6Z, 1KKZigSXtcvjYZwL8StM1fdRkMXSK6xixX, 16LbcfzTvUWJftfs2ivRyxTjKLcShPcCFr, 1JsEFyM4iTmzj9A78vtZruurjAr86XWEFS, 17smBzKdE7dBmRHA7XgVsr4ztvou5NB6KX, 1LcdyXkDcniJ7CQ7VC9SjdUZPucAKG7CnB, 1BUbCg53v3tLoLoDkRxBciw2rHUNpAi9rz, 1DXFUQ1kb4ANtP3A27vvkP4vWDoxjQcKji, 1PNQL3aSU9cAW3FvUg3mnpDKHjS6ffqVov, 1GGtmLXGSsQri3nQN9cZ9KTrsmxRjaTGyL, 18d3HV2bm94UyY4a9DrPfoZ17sXuiDQq2B
Something look wrong? Tell us