Block 374,985
Found by Eligius 2 minutes after the block before it. Its 177 transactions paid 0.02753168 BTC in fees, 0% of the miner's reward.
, 11 years 1 month ago
What's inside
Each square is one of its 177 transactions, as big as the space it took. The miner packs the best payers first, from the top left.
Facts
- Found
- 17 Sept 2015, 21:37 UTC
- Confirmations
- 599,996
- Transactions
- 177
- Size
- 100 kB10.0% full by weight
- Fees
- 0.02753168 BTC
- Reward
- 25.02753168 BTCnew coins plus fees
- Median fee rate
- 14 sat/vBmost paid 0.0 to 59 sat/vB
- Pool
- Eligiusfrom the coinbase: a claim, not proof
- Difficulty
- 59.34 G
Luck. Its hash was 3.1 times lower than it needed to be: luckier than 68% of blocks.
The chain
It carries the hash of block 374,984, the block before it. Change anything in that block and its hash changes, so this one no longer fits: that is what makes the blocks a chain. Block 374,986 carries this one's hash in turn.
Transactions
In block order, the miner's reward first. 25 to a page.
Technical details
- Hash
- 000000000000000005fde1724212ca48d65df01ea2e4fc948ba387f82cc79583
- Previous hash
- 000000000000000009f90eb5db6af8d583cfccefb8a7ebaa17bc6736ebaeb536
- Merkle root
- 9db62dcf118e9b402bd2b8cb063bcf44773fc2a6bdc9d7634fbbbca355c2aa2e
- Version
- 0x00000003
- Bits
- 181287ba
- Nonce
- 308,469,323
- Timestamp
- 1442525826
- Median time
- 17 Sept 2015, 20:59 UTC
- Weight
- 398,416 WU
- Chainwork
- 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000a439ed0bba26020fff2cc
What the miner wrote in the block's first transaction: Eligius /ss24/
Paid to 1Fd2YPTYuHKNzBAWaCVTj9PAiEkQJuJy87, 1Lp67byxEDEeiPNg9CwEtKmf6fdj3hzukk, 1JhYPsjPrrPj5zXbqUocEMNYC88tHBodiW, 1BuY5tBT7RypXguLwufJSB5VzK3d2QBnYu, 1DnuatqKgogHMUZR3UE45TbsY3ygk5adyz, 16Ek75xbugcfXufdSSNKuJEgQqKjasG3Li, 157NCGhcSQcSk5D1K5nmfMjJNP5cdffXme, 1B3rJa8jAHhCK6nuRQEfYWz4bDiCsbR5P3, 1P4zRYcgNfab76kf7A4wJ4cMxmPFSMLfVL, 1FCN4GKETyYgE8UQigo1ECSTM2reskFuFY, 1GUkuC3vSqaUTivGQGn9V6qWi5VJmi5fRr, 1JaxbrU7rMaA2hw5uGgCfXh18d8VaCYoCR, 18d3HV2bm94UyY4a9DrPfoZ17sXuiDQq2B
Something look wrong? Tell us