Block 925,828
Found by OCEAN 10 minutes after the block before it. Its 3,182 transactions paid 0.0136155 BTC in fees, 0% of the miner's reward.
, 11 months 7 days ago
What's inside
Each square is one of its 3,182 transactions, as big as the space it took. The miner packs the best payers first, from the top left.
Facts
- Found
- 30 Nov 2025, 08:16 UTC
- Confirmations
- 49,073
- Transactions
- 3,182
- Size
- 1.87 MB99.8% full by weight
- Fees
- 0.0136155 BTC
- Reward
- 3.1386155 BTCnew coins plus fees
- Median fee rate
- 1.0 sat/vBmost paid 0.0 to 2.0 sat/vB
- Pool
- OCEANfrom the coinbase: a claim, not proof
- Difficulty
- 149.30 T
OCEANLuck. Its hash made it under the target with an everyday margin: luckier than 47% of blocks.
The chain
It carries the hash of block 925,827, the block before it. Change anything in that block and its hash changes, so this one no longer fits: that is what makes the blocks a chain. Block 925,829 carries this one's hash in turn.
Transactions
In block order, the miner's reward first. 25 to a page.
Technical details
- Hash
- 00000000000000000001008bd303dbcd79e5a610ef6ebfd871a8b7560912ed67
- Previous hash
- 0000000000000000000089b23267c1f26f849bd6f9874ebef698ceb3963f5472
- Merkle root
- caa973a1370451d71eb8ad442ed8b7a4eb36a91a0bad170fcc701fa6ef73f19e
- Version
- 0x2eac4000
- Bits
- 1701e2a0
- Nonce
- 1,922,501,147
- Timestamp
- 1764490576
- Median time
- 30 Nov 2025, 07:13 UTC
- Weight
- 3,993,780 WU
- Chainwork
- 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000f9aae1c9926d61d889f9376c
What the miner wrote in the block's first transaction: < OCEAN.XYZ > NiceHash
Paid to bc1qztuue9qkmj48zhwxww6rzqm3caz7xtg7kudnv2, bc1qzk8vs4p3skr75nskpqyh4f9l0z3hmqd2u4tvpu, bc1q7fkekg66yly2ynaew7t9gdvt8cut0p0drzf2q4, bc1q7ur9nh720up3syvhnmgtl7s885lnvffn8nkjry, 13V4cPQ1A9Bmj3kXPF4szkSZ4HBAkwG9Lb, bc1qpthfpk8aj45363s4gm4j4d5g67c7gsfaljuyshyj8f5cr0kww6wsqaf7qg, bc1q6f3ged3f74sga3z2cgeyehv5f9lu9r6p5arqvf44yzsy4gtjxtlsmnhn8j, bc1qauy6m9mgjtwqjrwllwszgzc4xzp3p9mnd75p5y, 37dvwZZoT3D7RXpTCpN2yKzMmNs2i2Fd1n
Something look wrong? Tell us