Block 927,790
Found by OCEAN 21 minutes after the block before it. Its 3,122 transactions paid 0.02403456 BTC in fees, 1% of the miner's reward.
, 10 months 15 days ago
What's inside
Each square is one of its 3,122 transactions, as big as the space it took. The miner packs the best payers first, from the top left.
Facts
- Found
- 14 Dec 2025, 01:30 UTC
- Confirmations
- 45,911
- Transactions
- 3,122
- Size
- 1.57 MB99.9% full by weight
- Fees
- 0.02403456 BTC
- Reward
- 3.14903456 BTCnew coins plus fees
- Median fee rate
- 1.0 sat/vBmost paid 1.0 to 3.0 sat/vB
- Pool
- OCEANfrom the coinbase: a claim, not proof
- Difficulty
- 148.20 T
OCEANLuck. Its hash was 118 times lower than it needed to be: luckier than 99.15% of blocks.
The chain
It carries the hash of block 927,789, the block before it. Change anything in that block and its hash changes, so this one no longer fits: that is what makes the blocks a chain. Block 927,791 carries this one's hash in turn.
Transactions
In block order, the miner's reward first. 25 to a page.
Technical details
- Hash
- 000000000000000000000420a07e502f5a5c8fdf2577650a453ab7dc0698e48d
- Previous hash
- 000000000000000000004c08853fb3df35fff6b305f1c6aadb2cd96fd1fcec6b
- Merkle root
- 335b6dd5798f23e93b7f82cb8bdd9c0b2ee7f9578a274a6a4a5c04ebcecb5711
- Version
- 0x219d6000
- Bits
- 1701e63a
- Nonce
- 3,893,212,813
- Timestamp
- 1765675836
- Median time
- 13 Dec 2025, 23:58 UTC
- Weight
- 3,994,127 WU
- Chainwork
- 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000fdb9e5af4d757dfbba129dad
What the miner wrote in the block's first transaction: < OCEAN.XYZ > NiceHash
Paid to bc1qzk8vs4p3skr75nskpqyh4f9l0z3hmqd2u4tvpu, bc1qztuue9qkmj48zhwxww6rzqm3caz7xtg7kudnv2, bc1q7ur9nh720up3syvhnmgtl7s885lnvffn8nkjry, bc1q7fkekg66yly2ynaew7t9gdvt8cut0p0drzf2q4, 13V4cPQ1A9Bmj3kXPF4szkSZ4HBAkwG9Lb, bc1qpthfpk8aj45363s4gm4j4d5g67c7gsfaljuyshyj8f5cr0kww6wsqaf7qg, bc1q6f3ged3f74sga3z2cgeyehv5f9lu9r6p5arqvf44yzsy4gtjxtlsmnhn8j, bc1qauy6m9mgjtwqjrwllwszgzc4xzp3p9mnd75p5y, 37dvwZZoT3D7RXpTCpN2yKzMmNs2i2Fd1n
Something look wrong? Tell us