Block 929,687
Found by OCEAN 10 seconds after the block before it. Its 3,448 transactions paid 0.00365924 BTC in fees, 0% of the miner's reward.
, 9 months 28 days ago
What's inside
Each square is one of its 3,448 transactions, as big as the space it took. The miner packs the best payers first, from the top left.
Facts
- Found
- 27 Dec 2025, 07:14 UTC
- Confirmations
- 43,364
- Transactions
- 3,448
- Size
- 1.92 MB99.9% full by weight
- Fees
- 0.00365924 BTC
- Reward
- 3.12865924 BTCnew coins plus fees
- Median fee rate
- 0.0 sat/vBmost paid 0.0 to 1.0 sat/vB
- Pool
- OCEANfrom the coinbase: a claim, not proof
- Difficulty
- 148.26 T
OCEANLuck. Its hash made it under the target with an everyday margin: luckier than 45% of blocks.
The chain
It carries the hash of block 929,686, the block before it. Change anything in that block and its hash changes, so this one no longer fits: that is what makes the blocks a chain. Block 929,688 carries this one's hash in turn.
Transactions
In block order, the miner's reward first. 25 to a page.
Technical details
- Hash
- 000000000000000000010cc0b96ce6caf4d785971e64bf3b1229af55a29e0083
- Previous hash
- 00000000000000000001aed0821ca1869b25c9a2674e677d98d5dabdce4d6b4f
- Merkle root
- 65e23ba93635aac4b1e762ef8d05a020d423453258e83e59edeedab77153b4c1
- Version
- 0x20670000
- Bits
- 1701e605
- Nonce
- 3,556,259,087
- Timestamp
- 1766819658
- Median time
- 27 Dec 2025, 06:06 UTC
- Weight
- 3,994,245 WU
- Chainwork
- 000000000000000000000000000000000000000101a0be8f158d3bde5562cdc0
What the miner wrote in the block's first transaction: < OCEAN.XYZ > NiceHash
Paid to bc1qzk8vs4p3skr75nskpqyh4f9l0z3hmqd2u4tvpu, bc1qztuue9qkmj48zhwxww6rzqm3caz7xtg7kudnv2, bc1q7fkekg66yly2ynaew7t9gdvt8cut0p0drzf2q4, bc1q7ur9nh720up3syvhnmgtl7s885lnvffn8nkjry, 13V4cPQ1A9Bmj3kXPF4szkSZ4HBAkwG9Lb, bc1qpthfpk8aj45363s4gm4j4d5g67c7gsfaljuyshyj8f5cr0kww6wsqaf7qg, bc1q6f3ged3f74sga3z2cgeyehv5f9lu9r6p5arqvf44yzsy4gtjxtlsmnhn8j, bc1qauy6m9mgjtwqjrwllwszgzc4xzp3p9mnd75p5y, 37dvwZZoT3D7RXpTCpN2yKzMmNs2i2Fd1n
Something look wrong? Tell us