Block 931,250
Found by OCEAN 20 seconds after the block before it. Its 4,700 transactions paid 0.00254353 BTC in fees, 0% of the miner's reward.
, 9 months 25 days ago
What's inside
Each square is one of its 4,700 transactions, as big as the space it took. The miner packs the best payers first, from the top left.
Facts
- Found
- 7 Jan 2026, 08:53 UTC
- Confirmations
- 42,994
- Transactions
- 4,700
- Size
- 1.75 MB99.8% full by weight
- Fees
- 0.00254353 BTC
- Reward
- 3.12754353 BTCnew coins plus fees
- Median fee rate
- 0.0 sat/vBmost paid 0.0 to 0.0 sat/vB
- Pool
- OCEANfrom the coinbase: a claim, not proof
- Difficulty
- 148.26 T
OCEANLuck. Its hash was 2.4 times lower than it needed to be: luckier than 59% of blocks.
The chain
It carries the hash of block 931,249, the block before it. Change anything in that block and its hash changes, so this one no longer fits: that is what makes the blocks a chain. Block 931,251 carries this one's hash in turn.
Transactions
In block order, the miner's reward first. 25 to a page.
Technical details
- Hash
- 00000000000000000000c8994db935cb51360b0c8e53a44addc86aec1d7ebbf4
- Previous hash
- 00000000000000000000af3b78e98e8e708098300876cea4a88f08ec51cd8cc6
- Merkle root
- 8fb4795b59ea21f34e85da55400cf2a4ed5f3796171e2e644206e0241e54e02e
- Version
- 0x2004c000
- Bits
- 1701e605
- Nonce
- 894,523,411
- Timestamp
- 1767776027
- Median time
- 7 Jan 2026, 08:09 UTC
- Weight
- 3,993,675 WU
- Chainwork
- 000000000000000000000000000000000000000104d80519f2693fed0a6fabc4
What the miner wrote in the block's first transaction: < OCEAN.XYZ > NiceHash
Paid to bc1qzk8vs4p3skr75nskpqyh4f9l0z3hmqd2u4tvpu, bc1qztuue9qkmj48zhwxww6rzqm3caz7xtg7kudnv2, bc1q7fkekg66yly2ynaew7t9gdvt8cut0p0drzf2q4, bc1q7ur9nh720up3syvhnmgtl7s885lnvffn8nkjry, bc1qpthfpk8aj45363s4gm4j4d5g67c7gsfaljuyshyj8f5cr0kww6wsqaf7qg, bc1q6f3ged3f74sga3z2cgeyehv5f9lu9r6p5arqvf44yzsy4gtjxtlsmnhn8j, bc1qauy6m9mgjtwqjrwllwszgzc4xzp3p9mnd75p5y, bc1qh9rhekcgdmulrvxvhwfjpr9qejz4nahn8lf49v, 37dvwZZoT3D7RXpTCpN2yKzMmNs2i2Fd1n
Something look wrong? Tell us