Block 933,534
Found by OCEAN 11 minutes after the block before it. Its 3,017 transactions paid 0.02361517 BTC in fees, 1% of the miner's reward.
, 9 months 11 days ago
What's inside
Each square is one of its 3,017 transactions, as big as the space it took. The miner packs the best payers first, from the top left.
Facts
- Found
- 23 Jan 2026, 15:03 UTC
- Confirmations
- 41,128
- Transactions
- 3,017
- Size
- 1.65 MB99.9% full by weight
- Fees
- 0.02361517 BTC
- Reward
- 3.14861517 BTCnew coins plus fees
- Median fee rate
- 1.0 sat/vBmost paid 1.0 to 4.0 sat/vB
- Pool
- OCEANfrom the coinbase: a claim, not proof
- Difficulty
- 141.67 T
OCEANLuck. Its hash made it under the target with an everyday margin: luckier than 34% of blocks.
The chain
It carries the hash of block 933,533, the block before it. Change anything in that block and its hash changes, so this one no longer fits: that is what makes the blocks a chain. Block 933,535 carries this one's hash in turn.
Transactions
In block order, the miner's reward first. 25 to a page.
Technical details
- Hash
- 000000000000000000015052a3c7baa0277f30d482e07a8c3708b1958d54b388
- Previous hash
- 00000000000000000000f9c0ab215953693133a4d65ebb13add82897f5ed8819
- Merkle root
- 1a8c3df1395f6b2a71d24c4715c438225388a5f7f801b2d40ee300de8d920f7f
- Version
- 0x33288000
- Bits
- 1701fca1
- Nonce
- 3,847,009,987
- Timestamp
- 1769180621
- Median time
- 23 Jan 2026, 14:00 UTC
- Weight
- 3,994,090 WU
- Chainwork
- 0000000000000000000000000000000000000001097b4d37d367134fd4824e9b
What the miner wrote in the block's first transaction: < OCEAN.XYZ > NiceHash
Paid to bc1qztuue9qkmj48zhwxww6rzqm3caz7xtg7kudnv2, bc1qzk8vs4p3skr75nskpqyh4f9l0z3hmqd2u4tvpu, bc1q7fkekg66yly2ynaew7t9gdvt8cut0p0drzf2q4, bc1q7ur9nh720up3syvhnmgtl7s885lnvffn8nkjry, 1DwTRcse75MMiYxfyYGvErKAy2cUgpwhWc, bc1qpthfpk8aj45363s4gm4j4d5g67c7gsfaljuyshyj8f5cr0kww6wsqaf7qg, bc1q6f3ged3f74sga3z2cgeyehv5f9lu9r6p5arqvf44yzsy4gtjxtlsmnhn8j, bc1qauy6m9mgjtwqjrwllwszgzc4xzp3p9mnd75p5y, 37dvwZZoT3D7RXpTCpN2yKzMmNs2i2Fd1n
Something look wrong? Tell us