Block 956,451
Found by OCEAN 28 minutes after the block before it. Its 4,278 transactions paid 0.02742056 BTC in fees, 1% of the miner's reward.
, 3 months 25 days ago
What's inside
Each square is one of its 4,278 transactions, as big as the space it took. The miner packs the best payers first, from the top left.
Facts
- Found
- 3 Jul 2026, 05:28 UTC
- Confirmations
- 16,975
- Transactions
- 4,278
- Size
- 1.63 MB99.9% full by weight
- Fees
- 0.02742056 BTC
- Reward
- 3.15242056 BTCnew coins plus fees
- Median fee rate
- 2.0 sat/vBmost paid 0.0 to 4.0 sat/vB
- Pool
- OCEANfrom the coinbase: a claim, not proof
- Difficulty
- 133.87 T
OCEANLuck. Its hash made it under the target with an everyday margin: luckier than 46% of blocks.
The chain
It carries the hash of block 956,450, the block before it. Change anything in that block and its hash changes, so this one no longer fits: that is what makes the blocks a chain. Block 956,452 carries this one's hash in turn.
Transactions
In block order, the miner's reward first. 25 to a page.
Technical details
- Hash
- 0000000000000000000121cdc6e03aadcee17730a886860a05c76dc12c2e6d3e
- Previous hash
- 00000000000000000000242920eb273b4fb2d62d3465ab3b6f68da2d6a86ed80
- Merkle root
- bf8895abe70b00f98c520592a55a38d0b3d618590ea5e51c3e82842581c78eca
- Version
- 0x28000000
- Bits
- 17021a42
- Nonce
- 187,658,505
- Timestamp
- 1783056518
- Median time
- 3 Jul 2026, 04:42 UTC
- Weight
- 3,994,300 WU
- Chainwork
- 000000000000000000000000000000000000000134c3920e7fee49597898fe7c
What the miner wrote in the block's first transaction: < OCEAN.XYZ > NiceHash
Paid to bc1qw7t5jzzda8ahlnww07fukeffwmpwla4etwh698, bc1qztuue9qkmj48zhwxww6rzqm3caz7xtg7kudnv2, bc1qpqjh2zlwplafa6x5s0fgjr2vcqclhmeslpfcax, bc1q8tcfks4gg4sw0mpy2mryafw9t0t3pqrmx9vmgx, bc1qpthfpk8aj45363s4gm4j4d5g67c7gsfaljuyshyj8f5cr0kww6wsqaf7qg, bc1q6f3ged3f74sga3z2cgeyehv5f9lu9r6p5arqvf44yzsy4gtjxtlsmnhn8j, bc1qm29dsyqycupgxpt5q2n668g6xdcanc7xmsczwg, bc1q2824ekxc6ewypfpzv64h69frnx9dx6rsgek6ec, 37dvwZZoT3D7RXpTCpN2yKzMmNs2i2Fd1n
Something look wrong? Tell us