Block 956,623
Found by OCEAN 22 minutes after the block before it. Its 2,741 transactions paid 0.02420797 BTC in fees, 1% of the miner's reward.
, 3 months 21 days ago
What's inside
Each square is one of its 2,741 transactions, as big as the space it took. The miner packs the best payers first, from the top left.
Facts
- Found
- 4 Jul 2026, 07:58 UTC
- Confirmations
- 16,364
- Transactions
- 2,741
- Size
- 1.35 MB87.3% full by weight
- Fees
- 0.02420797 BTC
- Reward
- 3.14920797 BTCnew coins plus fees
- Median fee rate
- 2.0 sat/vBmost paid 1.0 to 4.0 sat/vB
- Pool
- OCEANfrom the coinbase: a claim, not proof
- Difficulty
- 133.87 T
OCEANLuck. Its hash was 17 times lower than it needed to be: luckier than 94% of blocks.
The chain
It carries the hash of block 956,622, the block before it. Change anything in that block and its hash changes, so this one no longer fits: that is what makes the blocks a chain. Block 956,624 carries this one's hash in turn.
Transactions
In block order, the miner's reward first. 25 to a page.
Technical details
- Hash
- 000000000000000000001f091f98e2fad1e3c61f2486086480e74781f38ca201
- Previous hash
- 00000000000000000000e32a02a699bc1a522da63c4d54564f5f9ea8d112a497
- Merkle root
- 24951415c060d4a475458ada6ec639be32a7e483de5aeabe813f53c02d5d7b47
- Version
- 0x201e4010
- Bits
- 17021a42
- Nonce
- 1,026,624,581
- Timestamp
- 1783151923
- Median time
- 4 Jul 2026, 06:48 UTC
- Weight
- 3,493,374 WU
- Chainwork
- 00000000000000000000000000000000000000013515600d0558af73034375d0
What the miner wrote in the block's first transaction: < OCEAN.XYZ > Roughnecks &*Hj8
Paid to bc1qw7t5jzzda8ahlnww07fukeffwmpwla4etwh698, bc1qztuue9qkmj48zhwxww6rzqm3caz7xtg7kudnv2, bc1qpqjh2zlwplafa6x5s0fgjr2vcqclhmeslpfcax, bc1qzk8vs4p3skr75nskpqyh4f9l0z3hmqd2u4tvpu, bc1q2824ekxc6ewypfpzv64h69frnx9dx6rsgek6ec, bc1qm29dsyqycupgxpt5q2n668g6xdcanc7xmsczwg, bc1q7ur9nh720up3syvhnmgtl7s885lnvffn8nkjry, bc1qz7znq6gna03qgvp3jj4vyqa9w2nu78qkwzds2n, 1LgGeuNU4ttigpJNdnqNdmiwVMfMUET894, 37dvwZZoT3D7RXpTCpN2yKzMmNs2i2Fd1n
Something look wrong? Tell us