Block 957,068
Found by OCEAN 1 hour 10 minutes after the block before it. Its 3,972 transactions paid 0.11266661 BTC in fees, 3% of the miner's reward.
, 3 months 15 days ago
What's inside
Each square is one of its 3,972 transactions, as big as the space it took. The miner packs the best payers first, from the top left.
Facts
- Found
- 7 Jul 2026, 18:05 UTC
- Confirmations
- 15,489
- Transactions
- 3,972
- Size
- 1.54 MB99.5% full by weight
- Fees
- 0.11266661 BTC
- Reward
- 3.23766661 BTCnew coins plus fees
- Median fee rate
- 7.0 sat/vBmost paid 3.0 to 14 sat/vB
- Pool
- OCEANfrom the coinbase: a claim, not proof
- Difficulty
- 133.87 T
OCEANLuck. Its hash was 2.2 times lower than it needed to be: luckier than 54% of blocks.
The chain
It carries the hash of block 957,067, the block before it. Change anything in that block and its hash changes, so this one no longer fits: that is what makes the blocks a chain. Block 957,069 carries this one's hash in turn.
Transactions
In block order, the miner's reward first. 25 to a page.
Technical details
- Hash
- 00000000000000000000f926898c9da79343c921f92fe717a0eb5ffbb46a112b
- Previous hash
- 00000000000000000001100ddf98b48a1b6b847966e921e794ad83dae0f6c833
- Merkle root
- 1b30a6ab0d70bb16452efddf14932cb92ad3652c66dfaf2bbe034cb6ad7a0c8a
- Version
- 0x20c4a010
- Bits
- 17021a42
- Nonce
- 465,065,837
- Timestamp
- 1783447508
- Median time
- 7 Jul 2026, 16:38 UTC
- Weight
- 3,979,231 WU
- Chainwork
- 000000000000000000000000000000000000000135e9055f8537de4ce8886613
What the miner wrote in the block's first transaction: < OCEAN.XYZ > Roughnecks
Paid to bc1qz7znq6gna03qgvp3jj4vyqa9w2nu78qkwzds2n, bc1qztuue9qkmj48zhwxww6rzqm3caz7xtg7kudnv2, bc1q2824ekxc6ewypfpzv64h69frnx9dx6rsgek6ec, bc1qzk8vs4p3skr75nskpqyh4f9l0z3hmqd2u4tvpu, bc1qpqjh2zlwplafa6x5s0fgjr2vcqclhmeslpfcax, bc1qpthfpk8aj45363s4gm4j4d5g67c7gsfaljuyshyj8f5cr0kww6wsqaf7qg, bc1q6f3ged3f74sga3z2cgeyehv5f9lu9r6p5arqvf44yzsy4gtjxtlsmnhn8j, bc1q7ur9nh720up3syvhnmgtl7s885lnvffn8nkjry, 37dvwZZoT3D7RXpTCpN2yKzMmNs2i2Fd1n
Something look wrong? Tell us