Block 957,868
Found by OCEAN 2 minutes after the block before it. Its 6,556 transactions paid 0.00784775 BTC in fees, 0% of the miner's reward.
, 3 months 9 days ago
What's inside
Each square is one of its 6,556 transactions, as big as the space it took. The miner packs the best payers first, from the top left.
Facts
- Found
- 13 Jul 2026, 14:56 UTC
- Confirmations
- 14,786
- Transactions
- 6,556
- Size
- 1.60 MB99.9% full by weight
- Fees
- 0.00784775 BTC
- Reward
- 3.13284775 BTCnew coins plus fees
- Median fee rate
- 0.0 sat/vBmost paid 0.0 to 1.0 sat/vB
- Pool
- OCEANfrom the coinbase: a claim, not proof
- Difficulty
- 127.17 T
OCEANLuck. Its hash made it under the target with an everyday margin: luckier than 20% of blocks.
The chain
It carries the hash of block 957,867, the block before it. Change anything in that block and its hash changes, so this one no longer fits: that is what makes the blocks a chain. Block 957,869 carries this one's hash in turn.
Transactions
In block order, the miner's reward first. 25 to a page.
Technical details
- Hash
- 00000000000000000001c40c5a83a77f39ef43f79ca9c0682ef11c43abce7200
- Previous hash
- 00000000000000000000001406b8441f3076464c68fbd46eb0e2601d66f70368
- Merkle root
- 22b492ba3b95d11e0d6ae5f26d6d5734bb35817908af329df0ab2e6544a8ae25
- Version
- 0x25b2e000
- Bits
- 1702369d
- Nonce
- 437,568,598
- Timestamp
- 1783954615
- Median time
- 13 Jul 2026, 14:41 UTC
- Weight
- 3,994,170 WU
- Chainwork
- 0000000000000000000000000000000000000001375f1af2c89fec2883350192
What the miner wrote in the block's first transaction: < OCEAN.XYZ > NiceHash
Paid to bc1qz7znq6gna03qgvp3jj4vyqa9w2nu78qkwzds2n, bc1qztuue9qkmj48zhwxww6rzqm3caz7xtg7kudnv2, bc1q2824ekxc6ewypfpzv64h69frnx9dx6rsgek6ec, bc1qpqjh2zlwplafa6x5s0fgjr2vcqclhmeslpfcax, bc1qzk8vs4p3skr75nskpqyh4f9l0z3hmqd2u4tvpu, bc1qpthfpk8aj45363s4gm4j4d5g67c7gsfaljuyshyj8f5cr0kww6wsqaf7qg, bc1q6f3ged3f74sga3z2cgeyehv5f9lu9r6p5arqvf44yzsy4gtjxtlsmnhn8j, bc1q7ur9nh720up3syvhnmgtl7s885lnvffn8nkjry, 37dvwZZoT3D7RXpTCpN2yKzMmNs2i2Fd1n
Something look wrong? Tell us