Block 959,673
Found by OCEAN 6 minutes after the block before it. Its 2,443 transactions paid 0.01620513 BTC in fees, 1% of the miner's reward.
, 2 months 23 days ago
What's inside
Each square is one of its 2,443 transactions, as big as the space it took. The miner packs the best payers first, from the top left.
Facts
- Found
- 26 Jul 2026, 07:59 UTC
- Confirmations
- 12,219
- Transactions
- 2,443
- Size
- 1.80 MB99.5% full by weight
- Fees
- 0.01620513 BTC
- Reward
- 3.14120513 BTCnew coins plus fees
- Median fee rate
- 1.0 sat/vBmost paid 1.0 to 2.0 sat/vB
- Pool
- OCEANfrom the coinbase: a claim, not proof
- Difficulty
- 126.23 T
OCEANLuck. Its hash was 4.0 times lower than it needed to be: luckier than 75% of blocks.
The chain
It carries the hash of block 959,672, the block before it. Change anything in that block and its hash changes, so this one no longer fits: that is what makes the blocks a chain. Block 959,674 carries this one's hash in turn.
Transactions
In block order, the miner's reward first. 25 to a page.
Technical details
- Hash
- 000000000000000000008de15f4c6843c665b036c51ea09978064f2d8546ed26
- Previous hash
- 0000000000000000000163333e0bda1c0fe7975845603498b757b4b65d1c88f1
- Merkle root
- 54b9c956f8ec9771892542e775cbbca5844a0eb5916a09cb457c25d89b24a516
- Version
- 0x32000010
- Bits
- 17023ad4
- Nonce
- 1,125,399,686
- Timestamp
- 1785052741
- Median time
- 26 Jul 2026, 06:24 UTC
- Weight
- 3,978,048 WU
- Chainwork
- 00000000000000000000000000000000000000013a8e6c84c2dae19d647341f6
What the miner wrote in the block's first transaction: < OCEAN.XYZ > Roughnecks
Paid to bc1qz7znq6gna03qgvp3jj4vyqa9w2nu78qkwzds2n, bc1qztuue9qkmj48zhwxww6rzqm3caz7xtg7kudnv2, bc1q2824ekxc6ewypfpzv64h69frnx9dx6rsgek6ec, bc1qf7vwalwqvytp9kdvsmp88d8mxu34r5pryavcxt, bc1qpqjh2zlwplafa6x5s0fgjr2vcqclhmeslpfcax, bc1q7ur9nh720up3syvhnmgtl7s885lnvffn8nkjry, bc1qvpm0q5rtwk6qn6ety7ld8cku0a7qznshqrz5w5, 1LgGeuNU4ttigpJNdnqNdmiwVMfMUET894, bc1q7fkekg66yly2ynaew7t9gdvt8cut0p0drzf2q4, 37dvwZZoT3D7RXpTCpN2yKzMmNs2i2Fd1n
Something look wrong? Tell us