Block 959,710
Found by OCEAN 6 minutes after the block before it. Its 1,483 transactions paid 0.01099901 BTC in fees, 0% of the miner's reward.
, 2 months 29 days ago
What's inside
Each square is one of its 1,483 transactions, as big as the space it took. The miner packs the best payers first, from the top left.
Facts
- Found
- 26 Jul 2026, 14:38 UTC
- Confirmations
- 13,267
- Transactions
- 1,483
- Size
- 953 kB53.6% full by weight
- Fees
- 0.01099901 BTC
- Reward
- 3.13599901 BTCnew coins plus fees
- Median fee rate
- 1.0 sat/vBmost paid 1.0 to 3.0 sat/vB
- Pool
- OCEANfrom the coinbase: a claim, not proof
- Difficulty
- 126.23 T
OCEANLuck. Its hash was 7.9 times lower than it needed to be: luckier than 87% of blocks.
The chain
It carries the hash of block 959,709, the block before it. Change anything in that block and its hash changes, so this one no longer fits: that is what makes the blocks a chain. Block 959,711 carries this one's hash in turn.
Transactions
In block order, the miner's reward first. 25 to a page.
Technical details
- Hash
- 00000000000000000000484e00cdc2e7d8d97520356249edabb0e876a6826d42
- Previous hash
- 000000000000000000009673df8e15848caba9111c6524964c3819db7bfcc5a5
- Merkle root
- 9b60500c5214aa6f07da1951408ef36d05a5d5019d454b8b28a62f75c71181eb
- Version
- 0x260ec010
- Bits
- 17023ad4
- Nonce
- 3,757,072,318
- Timestamp
- 1785076710
- Median time
- 26 Jul 2026, 14:06 UTC
- Weight
- 2,145,385 WU
- Chainwork
- 00000000000000000000000000000000000000013a9f047030023a476b468049
What the miner wrote in the block's first transaction: < OCEAN.XYZ > Roughnecks
Paid to bc1qz7znq6gna03qgvp3jj4vyqa9w2nu78qkwzds2n, bc1qztuue9qkmj48zhwxww6rzqm3caz7xtg7kudnv2, bc1q2824ekxc6ewypfpzv64h69frnx9dx6rsgek6ec, bc1qf7vwalwqvytp9kdvsmp88d8mxu34r5pryavcxt, bc1qpqjh2zlwplafa6x5s0fgjr2vcqclhmeslpfcax, bc1qh9rhekcgdmulrvxvhwfjpr9qejz4nahn8lf49v, bc1qedm3y2gct88g87f3vcjzve033n7zdqnpnuya7x, bc1q7ur9nh720up3syvhnmgtl7s885lnvffn8nkjry, bc1qzk8vs4p3skr75nskpqyh4f9l0z3hmqd2u4tvpu, 37dvwZZoT3D7RXpTCpN2yKzMmNs2i2Fd1n
Something look wrong? Tell us