Block 961,283
Found by OCEAN 13 seconds after the block before it. Its 3,202 transactions paid 0.03719993 BTC in fees, 1% of the miner's reward.
, 2 months 13 days ago
What's inside
Each square is one of its 3,202 transactions, as big as the space it took. The miner packs the best payers first, from the top left.
Facts
- Found
- 6 Aug 2026, 11:21 UTC
- Confirmations
- 10,950
- Transactions
- 3,202
- Size
- 1.50 MB99.5% full by weight
- Fees
- 0.03719993 BTC
- Reward
- 3.16219993 BTCnew coins plus fees
- Median fee rate
- 3.0 sat/vBmost paid 3.0 to 4.0 sat/vB
- Pool
- OCEANfrom the coinbase: a claim, not proof
- Difficulty
- 126.23 T
OCEANLuck. Its hash was 57 times lower than it needed to be: luckier than 98% of blocks.
The chain
It carries the hash of block 961,282, the block before it. Change anything in that block and its hash changes, so this one no longer fits: that is what makes the blocks a chain. Block 961,284 carries this one's hash in turn.
Transactions
In block order, the miner's reward first. 25 to a page.
Technical details
- Hash
- 0000000000000000000009edee9a71545ff8c73fb8fc683f2c19faa82df79f59
- Previous hash
- 0000000000000000000085e74947358517a8e12a75b6fa4991d5f8b4bde7f846
- Merkle root
- 0283197ef96902ebaa1e0300701a1ceed8084b1eaccfe5d7ea06299fd294e530
- Version
- 0x2a3aa010
- Bits
- 17023ad4
- Nonce
- 1,334,250,842
- Timestamp
- 1786015288
- Median time
- 6 Aug 2026, 08:58 UTC
- Weight
- 3,979,261 WU
- Chainwork
- 00000000000000000000000000000000000000013d60766d50840f614154489c
What the miner wrote in the block's first transaction: < OCEAN.XYZ > Roughnecks
Paid to bc1qya76dgjcddhq02rzmfvdcdvv344y47l8fdf5lp, bc1q2824ekxc6ewypfpzv64h69frnx9dx6rsgek6ec, bc1qpqjh2zlwplafa6x5s0fgjr2vcqclhmeslpfcax, bc1qzk8vs4p3skr75nskpqyh4f9l0z3hmqd2u4tvpu, bc1qpthfpk8aj45363s4gm4j4d5g67c7gsfaljuyshyj8f5cr0kww6wsqaf7qg, bc1q6f3ged3f74sga3z2cgeyehv5f9lu9r6p5arqvf44yzsy4gtjxtlsmnhn8j, bc1qs5y4tfvpxuw29thd8qmma4khucevngzyrv4s3e, bc1q7ur9nh720up3syvhnmgtl7s885lnvffn8nkjry, 37dvwZZoT3D7RXpTCpN2yKzMmNs2i2Fd1n
Something look wrong? Tell us