Block 961,397
Found by OCEAN 8 minutes after the block before it. Its 1,502 transactions paid 0.01920993 BTC in fees, 1% of the miner's reward.
, 2 months 16 days ago
What's inside
Each square is one of its 1,502 transactions, as big as the space it took. The miner packs the best payers first, from the top left.
Facts
- Found
- 7 Aug 2026, 08:14 UTC
- Confirmations
- 11,443
- Transactions
- 1,502
- Size
- 984 kB59.9% full by weight
- Fees
- 0.01920993 BTC
- Reward
- 3.14420993 BTCnew coins plus fees
- Median fee rate
- 2.0 sat/vBmost paid 1.0 to 10 sat/vB
- Pool
- OCEANfrom the coinbase: a claim, not proof
- Difficulty
- 126.23 T
OCEANLuck. Its hash made it under the target with an everyday margin: luckier than 34% of blocks.
The chain
It carries the hash of block 961,396, the block before it. Change anything in that block and its hash changes, so this one no longer fits: that is what makes the blocks a chain. Block 961,398 carries this one's hash in turn.
Transactions
In block order, the miner's reward first. 25 to a page.
Technical details
- Hash
- 00000000000000000001796fd56ff32d93cd9cfed2ecb83c119bd9b94016d0f8
- Previous hash
- 00000000000000000001a04d96accbfcefdca59b8ef566fe000f8a2a025992f6
- Merkle root
- 149c6c8c6be5ed31e8708b413ba8e98039ac583fbd2b60745919f8d924d5837b
- Version
- 0x30a52010
- Bits
- 17023ad4
- Nonce
- 1,389,004,362
- Timestamp
- 1786090442
- Median time
- 7 Aug 2026, 07:13 UTC
- Weight
- 2,396,573 WU
- Chainwork
- 00000000000000000000000000000000000000013d93969ca0d3c69d8db5a0da
What the miner wrote in the block's first transaction: < OCEAN.XYZ > Roughnecks
Paid to bc1qya76dgjcddhq02rzmfvdcdvv344y47l8fdf5lp, bc1q2824ekxc6ewypfpzv64h69frnx9dx6rsgek6ec, bc1qpqjh2zlwplafa6x5s0fgjr2vcqclhmeslpfcax, bc1qs5y4tfvpxuw29thd8qmma4khucevngzyrv4s3e, bc1q7ur9nh720up3syvhnmgtl7s885lnvffn8nkjry, 1LgGeuNU4ttigpJNdnqNdmiwVMfMUET894, bc1qzk8vs4p3skr75nskpqyh4f9l0z3hmqd2u4tvpu, bc1qsqt3nkn463248wrkxk629xj2vlldxd3c53d0jq, bc1qfjjad2522rsyrhjwwz42rttae46pha5vrsmax7, 37dvwZZoT3D7RXpTCpN2yKzMmNs2i2Fd1n
Something look wrong? Tell us